Defamation limitation period: just 12 months from publication. Get your free assessment now →
Now accepting urgent matters Australia-wide

Protect Your
Reputation

Australia's trusted defamation law practice. From false Google reviews and social media attacks to Federal Court litigation — we defend what matters most. Your good name.

Federal Court Practitioner
Singh v Singh [2025] FCA
6 National Media Features
Time-sensitive: The defamation limitation period is just 12 months from the date of publication. Every day you wait reduces your legal options. Early action leads to faster resolution and lower costs.
As Featured In National Media
Legal research and documents
Understanding The Law

Defamation Law in Australia

Defamation occurs when someone publishes material that damages another person's reputation in the eyes of ordinary, reasonable members of the community. Under Australian law, both individuals and small businesses (fewer than 10 employees) can bring defamation claims. The publication can be written, spoken, or digital — including social media posts, online reviews, emails, and text messages.

Australia's defamation laws are governed by the Uniform Defamation Laws, enacted as the Defamation Act 2005 in each state and territory. The 2021 Stage 2 reforms introduced a "serious harm" threshold requiring plaintiffs to demonstrate the publication has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to reputation.

The reforms also introduced a single publication rule for online content and a mandatory concerns notice process that encourages early resolution. If you believe your reputation has been damaged — or you've received a concerns notice — acting within the 12-month limitation period is critical.

At Matrix Legal, we combine deep legal knowledge with practical, commercially-minded strategy. We don't just advise — we act, and we act fast.

0
Practice Areas
0
Court Jurisdictions
0
National Media Features
24/7
Urgent Response
Proven Track Record

Real Cases. Real Results.

All matters referenced below are verified public record. No fabricated testimonials — just facts.

Federal Court Victory
Singh v Singh [2025] FCA 1531
Successful Federal Court representation by Mark Stanarevic in this significant defamation proceeding. Demonstrated Matrix Legal's ability to navigate complex Federal Court litigation at the highest jurisdictional level.
Federal Court — Favourable outcome
Platform Unmasking
Kabbabe v Google LLC
Landmark Federal Court order compelling Google to unmask an anonymous reviewer who published defamatory content. Established important precedent for court-ordered disclosure of anonymous users on global platforms.
Google ordered to reveal identity
Reviewer Unmasked
Garde-Wilson Case
Successful application requiring Google to reveal the identity of an anonymous reviewer, reinforcing the legal framework for holding online defamers accountable across Australian jurisdictions.
Anonymous reviewer identified
$170,000 Damages
Dentist Defamation Verdict
Significant damages award in a defamation case arising from false online reviews targeting a dental professional. Courts demonstrated willingness to award substantial damages for review-based defamation.
$170,000 damages awarded
Media Defence
COVID-Era Review Defence
Successfully handled review-related defamation during the pandemic, when online attacks surged dramatically. Mark Stanarevic was featured on 3AW Radio discussing business rights during this period.
Successfully resolved
Class Action
Google Class Action Investigation
Active involvement in preparation of potential class action proceedings against Google regarding its handling of defamatory reviews and platform responsibility for user-generated content.
Investigation ongoing
What We Do

Defamation Law Services

Comprehensive reputation protection across all Australian jurisdictions. Every matter handled personally by our principal lawyer.

Online Defamation Defence

False Google reviews, malicious social media posts, and anonymous online attacks can cause devastating reputational harm within hours. We provide rapid-response strategies including formal takedown requests, Federal Court applications for content removal, and injunctive relief where immediate action is required.

Plaintiff Representation

When your reputation has been damaged, we pursue claims with determination and strategic precision. We prepare mandatory concerns notices, negotiate offers to make amends, and litigate in the Federal Court or Supreme Court when negotiation fails.

Defendant Representation

If you've received a concerns notice or claim, the stakes are high. We develop robust defence strategies using the full range of statutory defences: substantial truth, honest opinion, qualified privilege, innocent dissemination, and the serious harm threshold.

Anonymous Unmasking

Anonymous defamers believe they can hide behind fake profiles. They're wrong. We apply to the Federal Court for orders compelling platforms like Google and Facebook to disclose real identities using preliminary discovery and Norwich Pharmacal principles.

Concerns Notices

The concerns notice is a mandatory first step before any proceedings. Getting it right is critical — a defective notice can derail your entire claim. We draft precise, strategically framed notices that comply with the Act while maximising your position.

Crisis & Reputation Management

When a reputational crisis strikes, you need a coordinated response across legal, PR, and digital dimensions. We work with trusted PR professionals to develop integrated strategies — from emergency injunctions to media statements.

Industries We Protect

Who We Help

Every industry faces unique reputational risks. We understand the specific challenges in your sector.

Medical & Dental

False patient reviews, competitor attacks, and online complaints that threaten your practice and registration.

Trades & Construction

Malicious reviews from disgruntled clients, competitor smear campaigns, and false allegations on review platforms.

Hospitality & Food

Fake restaurant reviews, food safety allegations, and coordinated review bombing that destroy bookings overnight.

Professional Services

Lawyers, accountants, consultants, and advisors targeted by dissatisfied parties or professional competitors.

Real Estate

Agents and agencies facing false claims about properties, personal conduct, or professional competence.

Education

Teachers, tutors, and institutions targeted by false allegations from students, parents, or disgruntled staff.

Retail & E-Commerce

Product defamation, competitor sabotage reviews, and false claims about business practices or product safety.

Public Figures

Politicians, media personalities, executives, and community leaders facing reputational attacks in media and online.

MS

Replace with professional headshot

Meet The Principal

Mark Stanarevic

Founder & Principal Lawyer

Mark Stanarevic is one of Australia's most recognised defamation law practitioners, with extensive experience in the Federal Court of Australia and Supreme Courts across multiple jurisdictions. He has represented individuals, businesses, medical professionals, and public figures in complex, high-profile defamation matters.

Mark's expertise spans the full spectrum of defamation law — from urgent takedown applications and anonymous reviewer unmasking to multi-party Federal Court proceedings. His work pursuing court orders against Google LLC to unmask anonymous reviewers has been widely covered in national media, including SBS News, 3AW Radio, ABC Radio, SmartCompany, The Independent (UK), and Channel News.

At Matrix Legal, Mark provides direct, principal-level involvement in every matter. No junior lawyers handling your case — when you engage Matrix Legal, you get Mark's personal expertise, strategic thinking, and courtroom experience from day one.

Federal Court Practitioner
Defamation Specialist
National Media Featured
Singh v Singh [2025] FCA 1531
Google Unmasking Cases
Class Action Experience
The Difference

Matrix Legal vs. Typical Law Firms

Not all defamation lawyers are the same. Here's what sets us apart from the rest.

FeatureMatrix LegalLarge FirmsGeneral Practice
Principal handles your matter personally✓ Always✗ Junior lawyers✗ Varies
Defamation-specialist expertise✓ Core focus✗ One of many areas✗ Rarely
Federal Court experience✓ Extensive✓ Yes✗ Limited
Google/platform unmasking experience✓ Multiple cases✗ Rare✗ None
Transparent pricing✓ Upfront estimates✗ Hourly billing✗ Varies
24/7 urgent response✓ Available✗ Business hours✗ Business hours
Integrated crisis management✓ Legal + PR + Digital✗ Legal only✗ Legal only
Direct founder access✓ Day one✗ Partners distant✓ Sometimes
Know Your Rights

The Legal Framework

Understanding the legal framework is essential whether you're bringing a claim or defending one.

Defamation Act 2005 — Uniform Laws

Australia's defamation laws are harmonised across all states and territories. The same core principles apply whether the publication occurred in Victoria, NSW, Queensland, or any other jurisdiction.

Stage 2 Reforms (2021 Amendments)

Introduced the serious harm threshold, single publication rule for online content, a new public interest defence, and reforms to the concerns notice process.

Concerns Notice Requirements

Before commencing proceedings, a plaintiff must serve a concerns notice identifying the defamatory matter, imputations, and serious harm. The publisher has 28 days to respond.

Available Defences

Key defences include substantial truth, honest opinion, qualified privilege, absolute privilege, innocent dissemination, and the new public interest defence for responsible journalism.

Remedies & Damages

Remedies include damages (general, aggravated, special), injunctions, corrections, and apologies. General damages are subject to a statutory cap indexed annually. Aggravated damages for malice are unlimited.

Professional office
How It Works

Our Process

A clear, strategic pathway from initial assessment to resolution. Every step handled directly by our principal.

1

Assessment & Strategy

Thorough analysis of your situation — reviewing the publication, identifying defamatory imputations, assessing available defences, evaluating strength of position, and developing a tailored strategy with transparent cost estimates.

2

Pre-Litigation Action

Where appropriate, we pursue resolution without court proceedings — drafting concerns notices, negotiating offers to make amends, issuing platform takedown requests, and engaging in strategic pre-litigation correspondence.

3

Court & Resolution

When litigation is necessary, we represent you with vigour in the Federal Court, Supreme Court, or relevant jurisdiction. We pursue the full range of remedies including injunctions, preliminary discovery, and damages awards.

Transparent Pricing

Clear Costs. No Surprises.

Unlike most law firms, we believe in pricing transparency. Here's what you can expect.

Initial Assessment
Free
No obligation
  • Detailed review of your situation
  • Strength assessment of your matter
  • Recommended strategy outline
  • Realistic cost estimate provided
  • Response within 24 hours
Federal Court
Custom
Based on complexity
  • Full Federal or Supreme Court representation
  • Interlocutory applications
  • Preliminary discovery for unmasking
  • Trial advocacy
  • Regular cost updates throughout
  • No hidden fees or unexpected charges
Common Questions

Defamation Law FAQ

Answers to the most common questions about defamation law in Australia.

What is defamation under Australian law?
Defamation occurs when someone publishes material that lowers another person's reputation in the eyes of ordinary, reasonable members of the community. Under the Uniform Defamation Laws (Defamation Act 2005), the publication must identify the plaintiff and convey one or more defamatory imputations. This includes online posts, Google reviews, news articles, social media comments, and even private messages sent to third parties. Only individuals, not-for-profit organisations, and small businesses (fewer than 10 employees) can sue for defamation.
What is the time limit for filing a defamation claim?
The limitation period is one year from the date of publication. For online publications, the Stage 2 reforms introduced a single publication rule — the clock generally starts from the date of first publication. Courts have very limited discretion to extend this period. This makes early legal advice absolutely critical — delay can mean losing your right to claim entirely.
Can I sue over a false Google review?
Yes. False Google reviews that damage your reputation can constitute actionable defamation. We can pursue formal takedown requests to Google, Federal Court applications for preliminary discovery to identify anonymous reviewers, injunctive relief to compel removal, and damages claims against the reviewer once identified. Cases like Kabbabe v Google LLC have established that Australian courts will order Google to disclose reviewer identities.
What defences are available?
The principal defences include: substantial truth (imputations are substantially true), honest opinion (genuinely held opinion based on proper material), qualified privilege (duty or interest to communicate), absolute privilege (parliamentary and judicial proceedings), innocent dissemination (for internet intermediaries), and the new public interest defence for responsible journalism on matters of public interest.
What damages can I recover?
Damages include: general (compensatory) damages for harm to reputation (subject to a statutory cap indexed annually), special damages for quantifiable financial losses, and aggravated damages where the defendant's conduct has been particularly malicious. Courts can also order injunctions, corrections, and formal apologies. In serious cases, total damages can be substantial — as demonstrated by the $170,000 dentist review verdict.
Can anonymous online defamers be identified?
Absolutely. The Federal Court has the power to order platforms like Google, Facebook, X, Reddit, and others to disclose real identities of anonymous users who published defamatory material. This is done through preliminary discovery applications or Norwich Pharmacal orders. We have significant experience in these applications, including obtaining successful unmasking orders against Google LLC.
Do I need to send a concerns notice before suing?
Yes — this is mandatory. Under the Defamation Act 2005, a plaintiff must give a concerns notice to the publisher before commencing proceedings. The notice must specify the defamatory matter, the imputations, and the serious harm caused. The publisher has 28 days to respond. Failure to comply with concerns notice requirements can delay or prevent your claim from proceeding.
What is the "serious harm" threshold?
Introduced by the 2021 Stage 2 reforms, this requires a plaintiff to establish that the publication has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. For corporations, this extends to "serious financial loss." This threshold filters out trivial claims and ensures court resources are directed toward genuinely harmful defamation.
What about interstate or international defamation?
The Uniform Defamation Laws apply across all Australian states and territories. For international publications accessible in Australia, courts may exercise jurisdiction if the publication was accessed by Australian readers. Cross-border enforcement presents complexities, particularly with publishers in jurisdictions with speech protections incompatible with Australian defamation law.
How much does a defamation case cost?
Costs vary significantly. A concerns notice and pre-litigation negotiation may cost several thousand dollars for straightforward matters. Federal Court proceedings are more substantial, though many cases settle before trial. We provide transparent cost estimates at the outset and regular updates throughout. Our initial assessment is completely free — we'll give you a realistic picture of likely costs and outcomes for your specific situation.
Take Action Now

Free Reputation Assessment

Answer a few quick questions and we'll assess your situation within 24 hours. Completely free. No obligation.

What describes your situation?

Select the option that best matches your needs.

Someone has published false statements about me or my business
I've received a defamation claim or concerns notice
My business has been targeted by false Google reviews
I need to identify an anonymous defamer
I want preventative reputation advice

Where was the material published?

This helps us determine the best approach.

Google Reviews or Google Business
Social media (Facebook, Instagram, X, TikTok, LinkedIn)
Traditional media (newspaper, TV, radio)
Workplace or professional communication
Forum, blog, or other website

When did this occur?

Timing is critical — the limitation period is just 12 months.

Within the last week
Within the last month
1 to 6 months ago
6 to 12 months ago — urgent
More than 12 months ago

What industry are you in?

This helps us understand your specific risks.

Medical / Dental / Healthcare
Trades / Construction / Real Estate
Hospitality / Retail / Food Service
Professional Services / Corporate
Personal / Public Figure / Other

Get Your Free Assessment

Provide your details and we'll review your matter within 24 hours.

Your information is confidential. We respond within 24 hours.

Assessment Submitted Successfully

Thank you. We'll review your matter and contact you within 24 hours. For urgent matters requiring immediate attention, call 1800 950 627 now.

MATRIX LEGAL

Protect Your Reputation Today

Don't wait — the limitation period for defamation claims is just 12 months from publication.

Free initial assessment. No obligation. Confidential.

Call Now